Talk:California State Route 75/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: SounderBruce (talk · contribs) 21:26, 25 March 2013 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * "In 1933, the highway from the San Diego–Coronado Ferry to Route 2 (now I-5) was added to the state highway system.[13] This was later designated as Legislative Route 199.[14]" Merge and mention when Legislative Route 199 was designated.
 * "In 1976, the California State Legislature renumbered the southern section (from I-5 to SR 125) SR 117,[49]" Might want to reword this sentence
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Looks pretty good, except for those two little things.  Sounder Bruce  22:33, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Fixed. --Rschen7754 22:41, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
 *  Sounder Bruce  22:43, 25 March 2013 (UTC)