Talk:Californium/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: F R E  Y W A  05:49, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

After the success of beryllium (see here), I am now going to review californium. This should go without a hitch or else you're fired! F R E Y W A  05:49, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

Comments
I'm now going through the article and fixing up all the punctuation errors...anybody who finds those I missed, feel free to correct them too. Lanthanum-138 (talk) 10:29, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Done, I guess. Article passed GA. Lanthanum-138 (talk) 13:34, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm really quite surprised myself that this took so short a time...! We should have another peer review (if there isn't one started already) before trying for FA again. Lanthanum-138 (talk) 13:36, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
 * You know, like what happened with fluorine. Lanthanum-138 (talk) 13:47, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
 * This is largely because nobody seems to have commented during this review. (With hindsight, I should've alerted Nergaal.) Lanthanum-138 (talk) 13:50, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
 * A second PR is not needed. I'll make a few more changes, mainly organizational, and then submit to FAC this weekend. --mav (reviews needed) 23:02, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Ah, I see all that discussion above. Hope it gets through FAC this time! Lanthanum-138 (talk) 11:05, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Actually, I want to wait until the Fluorine FAC is done or almost certain to pass. --mav (reviews needed) 01:22, 10 May 2011 (UTC)