Talk:Call (band)

Poetic Text?
Whats the deal?? Rabidphage 22:25, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

This is horrible. The article is more like a promotion for the band and less like an informative article. Someone please fix this. The writer of this article should be ashamed. Cyberkickme 01:33, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Fixed the whole article. It's MUCH better now. Limaj daas 11:10, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

The 2 member sacking section
THis whole section was biased, unsourced and inaccurate. i've removed it all and i request whoever wrote it, to go write it again, source it and double check info. Limaj daas 11:10, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Actually, i researched it when i was rewriting the history and then i put in everything i could find. Limaj daas 11:10, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Project importance
Call (band) was listed as mid importance, and I changed it to low importance. While a four box ranking table is a bit severe, it does seem that the immediate need for a suitably well-written article on the band Call is low. This is based in part upon the relatively few mentions in published materials. While Call, as a band with two studio albums, is certainly more important than many other bands that are also ranked "low", it doesn't seem to be of the same importance as the Arabian Sea article or the article on the town of Dera Ghazi Khan which are ranked in the "mid" range. --Bejnar (talk) 22:30, 29 March 2011 (UTC)