Talk:Caloscypha/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Hi, I am reviewing this article for GA. Just a few nitpicks:
 * "Prior to this, it had since 1968 been situated in the Pyronemaceae family ..." - this seems a bit clunky.
 * Have recast the sentence. Sasata (talk) 03:21, 4 July 2009 (UTC)


 * I cannot make sense out of the image in the infobox. What is going on with it? The other image looks like a cup.
 * I've switched things around so that the taxobox image is a classic cup-shape, while the other pic, which shows an older ripped or bruised specimen, has been moved further down with an explanatory caption. Sasata (talk) 03:21, 4 July 2009 (UTC)


 * One of your sources says that diseased seeds fail to germinate, but you only say this indirectly: "a possible cause for seed plants sown in local nurseries failing to germinate."
 * Have rewritten the sentence to more accurately reflect what the source says. Sasata (talk) 03:21, 4 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Since it is such a short article, perhaps you could be a little less terse in your descriptions, although the wikilinks to do a good job of explaining.
 * I added a bit more explanatory prose to introduce the section on the imperfect state, and tweaked the prose elsewhere. Also added a mycomorphbox, and a bit more info about the derivation of the genus and species names. Sasata (talk) 03:21, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

&mdash; Mattisse (Talk) 22:25, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The additions did improve the article. &mdash; Mattisse (Talk) 16:30, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Final GA review (see here for criteria)

Congratulations!
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): Clear and concise prose b (MoS): Follows relevant MoS
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): Well referenced b (citations to reliable sources): Sources are reliable  c (OR): No OR
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): Major aspects covered b (focused): Focused on topic
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias: Neutral
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.: Stable
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: Pass
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: Pass
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: Pass

&mdash; Mattisse (Talk) 16:30, 4 July 2009 (UTC)