Talk:Calypso-class corvette

Armour
G. A. Osbon says that that a steel protective deck, 1 1/2 " thick, extended for 100' amidships over the magazine, boilers, ane engine room. Osbon, p. 196. E.H. Archibald also gives that figure, p. 43, but on page 50 of the same book says that the armour was 1/2" thick over the engines. This article uses the larger figure. Kablammo (talk) 12:01, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
 * page 273 says 0.5". I'll ask Rif to spin by, and see if he can cast any light. Shem (talk) 21:02, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Brassey's 1896 Naval Annual also gives 1 1/2 inches for deck armour in this and previous class. P. 262 of the online copy; I cannot discern print page number from there.  Kablammo (talk) 15:10, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Calypso-class corvette. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110608222742/http://www.nmm.ac.uk/collections/prints/viewRepro.cfm?reproID=PU6293 to http://www.nmm.ac.uk/collections/prints/viewRepro.cfm?reproID=PU6293
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110605103533/http://www.heritage.nf.ca/greatwar/gallery/reserve/enlarge/b1722.html to http://www.heritage.nf.ca/greatwar/gallery/reserve/enlarge/b1722.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120227031004/http://search.stemnet.ca/cgi-bin/texis/webinator/search?pr=heritagewar&prox=page&rorder=500&rprox=500&rdfreq=500&rwfreq=500&rlead=500&sufs=0&query=calypso&submit=Submit to http://search.stemnet.ca/cgi-bin/texis/webinator/search?pr=heritagewar&prox=page&rorder=500&rprox=500&rdfreq=500&rwfreq=500&rlead=500&sufs=0&query=calypso&submit=Submit

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 13:40, 29 July 2017 (UTC)