Talk:Cambodian genocide

The Peter Landsiedel Source
This is an undetailed comment to be sure, but the Peter Landsiedel source that’s being used very early and prominently in the article to establish key facts about the genocide is painfully, abysmally weak and immediately throws the credibility of the entire article into question.

Surely there is a better, peer reviewed academic source that could be used to substantiate these important, basic-fact level claims. This source is essentially a Wordpress blog post. 2601:58D:200:DAF0:95B9:2484:A5CB:3105 (talk) 08:50, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

I'm concerned about the bit on women's advancements
Okay, this is kind of outside the normal parameters of discussion on Wikipedia and I don't think there's a specific policy that covers this. But the section on androcide, as it currently sits, kinda makes it sound like the genocide was a good thing for women. And it probably was in some ways. But it seems, I dunno...like emphasizing this might have some regrettable consequences? When I read it a part of my brain thought sheepishly, "Wow, we really are holding women back."

Does anyone else see it this way? Should we maybe de-emphasize the benefits of killing all men?

I promise I'm not trolling. 2603:7081:1603:A300:9F79:EF07:34F3:5044 (talk) 14:56, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

The title of the article is wrong
the article is about all of the crimes in cambodia, crimes against humanity and the genocide against the vietnamese. Since the icc have only ruled the 20,000 vietnamesd murdered as genocide, the title of the article should not be cambodian genocide, but perhaps crimes against humanity and genocide in cambodia. 83.89.30.26 (talk) 20:58, 6 July 2024 (UTC)