Talk:Camila Vallejo

Recognition section
This section should probably be deleted. Being chosen as "woman of the year" seems rather irrelevant to what she is actually trying to do. There isn't too much about what she has done politically, but there is a large section of her mention in magazines.Editfromwithout (talk) 08:24, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

BLPN thread on Camila Vallejo
I've recently closed a BLPN thread regarding the criticism section of this article. Although not all issues have been resolved, I think it's best they be discussed on this talk page. Criticism sections are particularly problematic, but in many cases should not be entirely effaced. The goal of an encyclopedic biography is to present everything in due weight: some things make the news, but not everything is of huge biographical significance. I've worked on it a little, but some parts should probably be trimmed further. I hope discussion ensues here before escalating again to WP:BLPN. Happy editing! JFHJr (㊟) 01:35, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The most notable controversies do generate enough media coverage for example and are notable. It's not appropriate to remove all that information from the article like Cerroblonco did. However, it's not ideal to have separate criticism or controversy sections but the information should instead be integrated with the rest of the article. For example, the contract controversy directly relates to her post of being the student union president and should be discussed in that section. I tried to integrate the most notable controversies to the rest of the article. --Pudeo' 21:40, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Request for Comments
There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages.

The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person.

Please help us determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 22:58, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Geographer
Her occupation is listed as "geographer" but she appears to solely work in government. What source describes her profession as a geographer? (A university degree does not a career make) – czar   04:17, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Camila Vallejo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120401011515/http://www.cnnchile.com/nacional/2011/10/03/el-partido-comunista-y-su-recambio-generacional/ to http://www.cnnchile.com/nacional/2011/10/03/el-partido-comunista-y-su-recambio-generacional/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 17:52, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Restoration of long-removed news content
User Dentren has recently restored some content that was removed years ago, about some remarks of Vallejo. Not only WP:NOTNEWS applies, it is part of a cruzade by Dentren to add contentious material related to people of the Boric government. Have to add, too, that they've been blocked just a couple of days ago for precisely the same reason, sole-purpose account, in this case, adding obvious POV-pushing content. I have reverted them twice and now I'm reporting them. Comments are welcome as long as they are constructive. Bedivere (talk) 16:18, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Have to add the removed content was removed in the first place for being a violation of BLP policies --Bedivere (talk) 16:23, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Yo are misusing the WP:NOTNEWS shortcut. There is nothing that prevents legitimate and sourced criticism of politicians to be included in Wikipedia as along as it does not violate WP:BLP guidelines. She is a politician and politicians are common targets of criticism by the very nature of work they do. Dentren &#124; Talk 19:39, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
 * It was removed back in 2013 precisely because it was a BLP violation. Bedivere (talk) 22:40, 4 November 2022 (UTC)