Talk:Camilla Broe

The Copenhagen Post
The link that was provided to the Copenhagen Post was not an article written by the journalist. It was a piece written by one of the readers. Every reader have the right to post whatever they like about the case. Personally I dont believe it belongs on the Wikipedia.

I can find a ton of pro-Broe blogs. Here is one which follows the case week per week: She is mentioned on the blog of Danish xenophobia victims: Youth who are considering an exchange student experience will also find her name on the typical webpages, they consult:
 * Rotsne's blog
 * Danish xenophobia victims blog
 * The Camilla Broe case, Exchange Student Info

I could go on but I believe that in order to make a proper article, it is important that we only enter text, which is well documented. I recognize that this case is highly political where Danes believe that it is injustice and some Americans who are not judges by profession believe that even the white collar part of the drugs business should be prosecuted also. It is against all Danish traditions where the first rule is that money doesn't smell. It doesn't matter how the money were earned. Undercover television has proved that crimes like human-trafficing are controlled by lawyers who rent out office space for brothels. Bikergangs are used as bodyguards and security consultants by even large firms regardless of their other criminal activities. You have to accept that Denmark is member of EU including a criminal eastern Europe, where you have to bring your own "police force" as firm if you want to do business. It means that there is little understanding for a prosecution against a woman who has only admitted guilt to knowledge about some logistic questions in this drug smuggling operation AngelaBurns (talk) 08:29, 20 January 2010 (UTC)