Talk:Camilla Tominey

Controversy section
I am again removing the controversy section because, as I stated in an edit summary, this content is contentious material about a living person that is poorly sourced. Many of the citations cover what Tominey said, but the commentary on the aftereffects or controversies is unsourced and appears to be original research. seems to agree that the sourcing here is problematic. Per WP:BLPREMOVE, this poorly sourced content should be removed immediately. Instead of edit warring, can the supporters of this content please engage in some discussion here? Firefangledfeathers (talk) 17:36, 23 June 2021 (UTC)


 * , I agree and thank you for addressing this. Andysmith248 (talk) 20:23, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

False claims
Some of the examples in this article are worthy of inclusion, if they can be confirmed with more reliable sources. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:43, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
 * If. Jonathan A Jones (talk) 06:45, 19 December 2021 (UTC)