Talk:Camille Claudel (film)

References to use

 * Please add to the list references that can be used for the film article.


 * — Preceding unsigned comment added by Erik (talk • contribs) 18:26, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 02:38, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Camille claudel aff.jpg
Image:Camille claudel aff.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:45, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Sami Film?
Why is this film categorized as a Sami film? Is it Sami or Sami language in it? If its not, please removed the category - Thanks. Dinkytown (talk) 05:14, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I removed it as the person who put that there has a history... Dinkytown (talk) 05:21, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Rotten Tomatoes
Shouldn't we mention that this movie has had a 100% at the Tomatometer? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.197.101.126 (talk) 02:20, 5 April 2009 (UTC)