Talk:Camp Paxson Boy Scout Camp

Cite template
One of the requirements in citation is that you have to have read the source that you are citing, so can I suggest that this ref: might actually be a cite web, if you only read the online source, not the original Missoulian newspaper article from 1965? If that is so, then perhaps something like: might be a better citation (assuming I've followed the links correctly). --RexxS (talk) 18:27, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
 * - originally written in 1965 and published as a feature article in The Missoulian newspaper
 * Doing now. Pumpkin Sky  talk  22:31, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Former camp
From the article and links, this appears to be a former Scout camp, thus the Scout camp category is no longer appropriate. ---— Gadget850 (Ed)  talk 11:20, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't know about scout camps, but a dead composer is still in cat:composers, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:39, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Do composers get repurposed after death? Paxson was a Scout camp from 1924 to 1942— that is 18 years, and it is now 64 years later. ---— Gadget850 (Ed)  talk 13:35, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
 * It's still a major scout connection. Where' it say the cat is only for active ones? Want to remove the ScoutingProject banner too? Pumpkin Sky  talk  15:32, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Not to mention it has Boy Scout in the NRHP title. Pumpkin Sky  talk  15:33, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Was going to propose a new category, as there are at least two other former camps not in the category, but I am abandoning this line and taking the article off my watchlist. ---—  Gadget850 (Ed)  talk 16:16, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Composers do get repurposed after death, but I've never seen one moved into the category "decomposers". (Couldn't resist.) --RexxS (talk) 18:04, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
 * We can make a new cat if you want, probably the best solution. Pumpkin Sky  talk  20:35, 11 June 2012 (UTC)