Talk:Campden wonder

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the . Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

move to Campden Wonder. &mdash; Nightst a  llion  (?) 12:42, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Talk:The campden wonder — The campden wonder → The Campden Wonder – Title should be capitalized Mjpovey 00:00, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~ 


 * Oppose as stated; should be Campden wonder by the manual of style. Campden Wonder is possible, but less desirable.  Septentrionalis 04:36, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
 * I think "Campden Wonder" is best; if you disagree, I won't be agree if you move it to your preferred version. ;) &mdash; Nightst a  llion  (?) 12:42, 3 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Merge with The Campden Wonder
This article duplicates article "The Campden Wonder". As the primary author of that article, naturally I think that article's better. ;) Objectively, given the number of grammatical and spelling errors in Campden Wonder and the fact that I know The Campden Wonder to have been fact-checked, while I'm not sure about Campden Wonder, I think it does make sense to replace this article by the text currently at "The Campden Wonder", and make that a redirect page.

I mistrust some of the detail in the Campden Wonder article, because I gather that many later accounts were distorted. I do think the mention of Edward Harrison is probably worth keeping, if it's verifiable from a primary source. --Quuxplusone 06:09, 28 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Update, ten seconds later: Hmm, looks like this article was created before The Campden Wonder. But I'm sure I checked this title before creating that page, so I'm confused now... --Quuxplusone 06:11, 28 April 2006 (UTC)