Talk:Camrose, Alberta

Move discussion in progress
There is a move discussion in progress on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Alberta which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. 117Avenue (talk) 00:36, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Camrose, Alberta. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added tag to http://www.camrosecanadian.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?archive=true&e=1803645
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150909022911/http://ftp2.cits.rncan.gc.ca/pub/geott/atlas/archives/english/3rdedition/environment/climate/030.jpg to http://ftp2.cits.rncan.gc.ca/pub/geott/atlas/archives/english/3rdedition/environment/climate/030.jpg

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 22:34, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Change proposal: Fix the rather suspicious description of the college
I don't like the way part of section 7.2 is worded, specifically the part that begins with "as a Faculty of the University of Alberta...", ends with Template:Citation Needed, and sounds like it came straight out of a brochure (no seriously, I can practically hear "Stellaris MegaCorp OST - The March of Profits" while reading it). I think, in order to stay in line with Wikipedia's purpose (and avoid meeting WP:G11 in that section), we should either either resolve the Citation needed to determine if it came from an advertisement, figure out a way to reword it in an unbiased way, or both.

I saw another page (one about a supposedly "academic" society I'm part of, so I'd be lying if I said I wasn't slightly disappointed with my peers...) get deleted and locked for similar G11 concerns, so while this is only a part of the page and probably not as severe, I'm nonetheless a little concerned. We can do better than this!--Macks2008 (talk) 20:12, 15 October 2020 (UTC)