Talk:Camryn

Parents
Billionaire parents are in. Please discuss here if you would like to have them removed, citing the relevant policies that including them violates. Only in death does duty end (talk) 14:58, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Current revision is a reasonable compromise. The father is notable out of the parents, and 'billionaire' is redundant as anyone interested in his wealth will find that out pretty quickly from looking at his page.Only in death does duty end (talk) 15:36, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

--orange mike. can you please tell me why you removed camryn's philanthropic efforts from her background section? all of which were referenced. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stamez (talk • contribs) 20:54, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Because they are not encyclopedic content. Rich celebrities donate to charities: big whupp! -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  21:14, 12 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Can you explain why Demi Lovato, a well known celebrity, is allowed to have charitable contributions on her page. ref 3 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demi_lovato. As well as Selena Gomez, another well known celebrity, second paragraph talks about her United Nations Children's Emergency Fund. ref 4 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selena_Gomez  --stamez

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Camryn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20121111182317/http://vanswarpedtour.com/media/id/71749389 to http://vanswarpedtour.com/media/id/71749389

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 01:20, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

COI editing here
Since there's no discussion here, and the article appears to have had plenty of review by experienced editors, I wanted to at least bring it up. I don't know what problems may be still in the article, and it may be a non-issue at this point. --Ronz (talk) 19:34, 23 January 2019 (UTC)