Talk:Canada's Worst Driver 6

Should we start a vomit count? - Seriously... this kid pukes all the time.
Should we start a vomit count? - Seriously... this kid pukes all the time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.72.70.66 (talk • contribs) 12:44, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Sorry I have to challenge something with the Episode 2 Summary.
Andrew didn't actually say Scott may never be charged with his driving offenses Cam reported, he just mentioned "who knows if he ever will be" expressed as if he is unsure if/when Scott will be charged with all of his offenses in the future.

Tibbydibby (talk) 18:16, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Actually, that means the same thing, really. Of greater concern, writing now as a professional journalist, is some of the wording that I have now changed to protect Wikipedia from contempt of court charges and major WP:BLP issues. Some of the terms used in describing issues discussed in the episode violated the spirit of "innocent until proven guilty" and have been changed. The fact Scott had not been charged at the time the episode aired (and as far as we know has yet to be charged) means certain terms must not be used, regardless what he said or did during his time on the series. Full stop. 68.146.64.9 (talk) 07:23, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for clarifying! Tibbydibby (talk) 04:55, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I have made a few changes. I removed the word allegadly and replaced it with a the fact that Scott has made statements on camera. I don`t think that is a BLP problem since he himself said this though if anyone has a problem feel free to make any changes.--76.66.180.54 (talk) 05:55, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Dale's Nominator
John is Dale's NEPHEW, not husband.

Tibbydibby (talk) 22:04, 17 November 2010 (UTC)