Talk:Canada–Philippines waste dispute

A month overdue
It looks like this article is a month late with any updates. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:43, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Please don't be dissuaded from making any such updates. The most recent changes in the incident itself that I noted were at the end of May, though I haven't gone through the sources I archived at that time.  I'll try and get to it in the next few days if you don't beat me to it.  —   fourthords  &#124; =Λ= &#124;  23:11, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Oh, I have no interest or knowledge of the subject in hand, but it was tagged a while ago and yet still somehow featured on the main page.  The Rambling Man (talk) 05:22, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
 * It hasn't been on the main page yet. It was shuffled to a later prep when the prep was moving to queue because of the tag. --valereee (talk) 21:18, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Great so it'll be fixed. I'd have thought that would be a rudimentary check but I can't comment on that. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:31, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Rudimentary as in basic? Yeah, I'd call it system working as intended. Review was done, hook was promoted, article was tagged, someone noticed, hook was pulled before being queued. --valereee (talk) 00:55, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

a push toward comprehensiveness
IAW this edit by, this article is not "comprehensive enough". Can anybody help with finding the crucial information lacking from the article? If you don't want to integrate it into the article yourself, can you add the sources above and I'll do my best to work them in? Thanks! —  fourthords  &#124; =Λ= &#124;  17:52, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
 * With the events of this article concluded, it appears to be B-class to me. Reliable sources are used and the rest of the criteria are satisfied in my opinion. There’s likely minor improvements necessary to become a GA. ZsinjTalk 08:20, 17 April 2023 (UTC)