Talk:Canadian Light Rail Vehicle/Archive 1

Merger proposal

 * The Articulated Light Rail Vehicle is merely a variant of the CLRV.
 * Neither article is particularly substantial.
 * "articulated light rail vehicle" is a generic description.
 * On both pages the See also/External links/References sections are just as long as the main text.
 * Useddenim (talk) 12:20, 20 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Neutral – It could work, so long as there is a distinction within the merged article demonstrating that they are two different vehicles with two different time lines of production etc. Another option would be to expand both articles with relevant content. There is more information that could be presented if someone(s) wanted to do the research. eja2k 15:39, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Neutral - I wouldn't bother merging them, but it's fine if someone wants to. The two vehicles would still need separate infoboxes anyway, so the article would look even more silly than it does now, with huge infoboxes and only a couple lines of text.Reaperexpress (talk) 16:10, 4 October 2011 (UTC)