Talk:Canadian Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Will return to see if major issue addressed before declining
Am declining to review at this moment, because the article is entirely unverifiable. The organisation articles to which you Wikilink are fair to poorly done; you have simply abandoned altogether the requirement that your material be sourced, and so verifiable. For an organization such as this, with ample material available, there is no reason to excuse this blatant omission.

Please see Wikipedia policy, WP:VERIFY, or simply provide an inline citation to a published source that covers all factual content contained in the article. There needn't be one citation per line, but all content must be sourced and verifiable. In general, for any content that is available from independent sources, especially claims made regarding importance, prominence, etc., sources should be independent (non-CSCMR). Please do not place bare URLs as citations; use standard citation formats, which you can see by clicking on the Edit tab of any comparable, good (un-tagged) article. If this is not understood, see WP:VERIFY, and skim/search for key terms mentioned here. You may reply here (my Talk pages are not a venue for reply; messages there are deleted), but there is a 1000 article backlog, and I will offer no guarantee of correspondence—because every moment spent here is another good, ready article not approved. Cheers, bonne chance. Le Prof Leprof 7272 (talk) 04:39, 2 December 2016 (UTC)