Talk:Candice Michelle/GA1

GA Reassessment
This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Candice Michelle/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

This article has been reviewed as part of WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the Good article criteria. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed.
 * It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * The prose qualifies for GA but is not of a very high standard. I recommend copy edits, peer reviews and successive revision to improve it.


 * It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * The personal life section is a total mess. Four random facts given in a list format is not a personal life. This has to be expanded to include relevant information and written in coherent sentence form. Once this is done, this article will pass GAR.--Jackyd101 (talk) 17:13, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Very nice tidy and expansion, notice a few other improvements here too.--Jackyd101 (talk) 16:24, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

I will check back in no less than seven days. If progress is being made and issues are being addressed, the article will remain listed as a Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted (such a decision may be challenged through WP:GAR). If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at WP:GAN. Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions, and many thanks for all the hard work that has gone into this article thus far. Regards, Jackyd101 (talk) 17:13, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
 * It is stable.
 * It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
 * a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
 * Overall:
 * a Pass/Fail:
 * a Pass/Fail:
 * Well done, fast work and this will now pass, although please maintain the article as time goes by or it may be delisted. Regards--Jackyd101 (talk) 16:24, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much! :) Nikki  311  19:35, 22 July 2008 (UTC)