Talk:Canning Dam/GA3

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

This article does not currently meet the well-written, verifiable or broad in its coverage criteria. Specific issues are as follows: Steelkamp (talk) 16:16, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Large amounts of text with no citations.
 * Use of phrases that have become outdated such as "newly completed" or "Recently".
 * "state of the art" is wording that should be avoided.
 * Short paragraphs, some only one sentence long, hinder readability.
 * "and the work was completed on schedule to a date that was calculated seven years previously." This is hard to understand and does not make sense.
 * "loss of linkage". This is poor writing.
 * "Periodic flooding of the Canning River from the dam is required to disperse seed, stimulate germination and ensure seedlings survive". Seedlings of what types of plant?
 * Some of this feels like its written about the Canning catchment rather than the Canning Dam. Why is the highest point in the catchment important for example.