Talk:Canning Vale College

Victuallers 14:39, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

I reverted this article as it doesnt comply with NPOV. Also the Senior section of the school has now been operating for 15 days. I know the schools philosphy is to create an enduring culture within the school and its wider community but here isnt the place.

This school has very interesting building methods along unique technology systems for a high school. Combined with experiemental teaching methods and social structures all of which will make a worthy article. Gnangarra 04:09, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Revert NPOV tag
The article is clearly biased towards the school, and lacks key information about it's negative side. It reeks of bias, so I've placed an NPOV warning. 68.22.252.165 02:21, 28 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The information in the article is only numerical facts it doesnt discuss indiviuals employed in the school nor does it discuss or place judgement on teaching methods as per the previously removed section(above). If there are negative encyclopedic aspects about the school please show them in the talk page. Until then I have have removed your tag Gnangarra 05:04, 28 March 2006 (UTC)


 * 68.22.252.165, you need to more specific in explaining your issues with the article. What parts are baised towards the school?  Are you aware of any verifiable "key information about its negative side" that should be in the article?
 * Gnangarra, your edit summary "revert - vandalism" was not appropriate. Wikipedia's official policy on vandalism states "Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism." There is no evidence to suggest that the addition of the NPOV tag was not done in good-faith.
 * Snottygobble 05:43, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

"The college is different to education facilities built in the 20th century. The design of the buildings and learning programs is based on the latest research..." and, "Environmental responsibility is an aim of the college..." are clear statements of opinion, and opinions cannot be proven or disproven. All content must be verifiable and, since these two statements are clearly biased, I am going to put the npov sign above the last two paragraphs for now. I will not get into an arguement over this, though, and anyone who wishes to seek moderators with me and use the wikipedia methods of conflict resolution can feel free to contact me or post here in reply. 68.22.252.165 06:38, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

User 155.205.200.32(talk) added comments to the page which were removed, and should have been since they were opinion, but I'm going to show what they said: "Environmental responsibility is an aim of the college, but has lacked due to no interest from the principal." 68.22.252.165 02:11, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

There's nothing special about a school using wireless internet or thumb drives. I've removed the text, because it's obvious that any school with computers does this. As that seemed to be the disputed paragraph, I've also removed the dispute tag. - Che Nuevara:  Join  the   Revolution 19:28, 13 July 2006 (UTC)


 * 68.22.252.165, you rock, man! Now the article is as bland and pointless as it should be, making the school seem as uninteresting as it probably is.  Nice work!  Kamikaze Highlander 03:35, 27 July 2006 (UTC)