Talk:Cannon Fodder 3/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 09:22, 8 September 2012 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * "Cannon Fodder 3 is an action-strategy PC game developed and published - originally in Russia - by Game Factory Interactive, along with developer Burut CT." perhaps: developed and published in the Russian-based Game Factory Interactive, along with developer Burut CT (however, I don't know where the last company is located)
 * That sentence would actually say that the game was developed in the company, which I don't think makes sense. I believe Burut CT is based in Ukraine, but that's not mentioned in any of the sources. bridies (talk) 13:08, 8 September 2012 (UTC)


 * "a popular acclaimed game released for multiple formats in 1993. " - popularly acclaimed? Suggest to remove one of the words. If you want to say that it was both commercially and critically successful, then write it.
 * Done. bridies (talk) 13:08, 8 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Not a requirement, but I would add in brackets the abbreviation of Game Factory Interactive, eg Game Factory Interactive (GFI) in the first sentence
 * Done. bridies (talk) 13:08, 8 September 2012 (UTC)


 * " though using the keyboard to deploy additional weaponry" How about "though the keyboard is used to deploy additional weaponry"?
 * Done. I was keeping it in the default active voice. Changed it nevertheless. bridies (talk) 13:08, 8 September 2012 (UTC)


 * What role had Burut CT in the development?
 * A couple of the sources state it developed the game. Which I assume means it did the programming, design, actually making the game (with GFI doing the legalities, licensing, marketing, publishing). However, a couple of other sources said GFI did the development. So I just reported both versions. There's one source (Metro) which lists both as developers but as it's the only source that does this, and it appeared several days after I put up this article, I believe its source for that was this article xD And whichever the source, it's not any more specific than "developed the game". bridies (talk) 13:08, 8 September 2012 (UTC)


 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall: Looks good but needs a few corrections. --Kürbis (✔) 10:08, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall: Looks good but needs a few corrections. --Kürbis (✔) 10:08, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall: Looks good but needs a few corrections. --Kürbis (✔) 10:08, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail: