Talk:Canon EOS 5D Mark III

Timeline Classification Misleading
There is no such thing from Canon Range as: "Flagship, High End and Mid-Range". According to the website, there are 3 classifications, they are: Entry Level | Enthusiast | Professional

Mid range and high end are too subjective to classify cameras. I believe the Canon Website is the most reliable and most objective in classifying the timeline. I didn't create the table and I don't want to ruin it an get in trouble. May I request to the creator or someone who is knowledgeable to fix it.

Visit here: http://www.canon.com.au/For-You/EOS-Digital-SLR-Cameras D. Lau (talk) 10:03, 28 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Copied to Template talk:Canon DSLR cameras. GregorB (talk) 19:35, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

2 years later, I fixed it. I wish I would have seen this earlier. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.201.174.85 (talk) 11:37, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

uncompressed HD video
According to Canon, an April '13 firmware update will add uncompressed HD video and improve autofocus performance. SwineFlew? (talk) 05:09, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Image removal
, did you remove the image because you are unable to verify the type of camera. The credits in the source list the equipment used. There is only one still image camera on the list. There is also a video camera and a bunch of lenses.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 20:02, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Cubesat
Canon created a cubesat based on this camera although it failed to reach orbit:


 * https://www.dpreview.com/news/6942720851/canon-is-sending-a-satellite-with-high-resolution-camera-tech-into-space
 * https://petapixel.com/2020/07/06/canon-5d-mark-iii-satellite-camera-destroyed-in-failed-rocket-launch/

©Geni (talk) 14:57, 8 July 2020 (UTC)


 * was apparently called CE-SAT 1B https://spaceflightnow.com/2020/10/28/rocket-lab-successfully-launches-satellites-for-planet-and-canon/ ©Geni (talk) 07:43, 29 January 2021 (UTC)