Talk:Canon NoteJet/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 03:52, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but I'm going to have to quick-fail this one. It's just nowhere near complete. For instance, there's way more that could be said about the features than just on sentence. Anything new to this model of printer, for instance? Or what were the various components of this printer? What did it allow the user to do?

Or for history. What was the design process of this? Who were the engineers who helped design it, and what was the motivation for designing this printer? What marketing activities were done?

The different models are way too short, we aren't given enough information about these models, and what defines them.

Why was it discontinued? We aren't really told at all.

Also, there's a couple spots with no citations, such as "The Canon BN200 is an upgrade from the BN22. It has an active matrix 800x600 LCD." or "The NoteJet branding was not used in Europe.", as pretty much everything will need to be cited for GA level.

Sorry, but this is just nowhere near WP:GACR #3a. I'm going to have to fail this, as it needs lots of expansion. Hog Farm Talk 04:21, 27 March 2021 (UTC)