Talk:Canon de 130 mm Modèle 1924

Assessment
So that's start class. 69.165.196.103 (talk) 16:30, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
 * B1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points have appropriate inline citations. Yellow check.svg Fails, but just For it's length, it is appropriately sourced, however addition of more would help achieve other criteria
 * B2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. X mark.svg Fails If it says "used on a number of French destroyers", surely you can find more. Also, it's very short and some of the technical terms could be shortly explained to help readers.
 * B3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. Yes check.svg Passes
 * B4. It is free from major grammatical errors. Yes check.svg Passes
 * B5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. X mark.svg Fails. There's none - a picture of the gun (and possibly it's ammunition) would be a useful first step <br