Talk:Canon de 130 mm Modèle 1932 and 1935

Assessment
So that's start class. (and almost the same comments as the other article I assessed) 69.165.196.103 (talk) 17:31, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
 * B1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points have appropriate inline citations. Yellow check.svg Fails, but just For it's length, it is appropriately sourced, however addition of more would help achieve other criteria
 * B2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. X mark.svg Fails, could be reassessed by somebody else It's too short for me to conclude whether if covers the topic reasonably or not.
 * B3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. Yes check.svg Passes
 * B4. It is free from major grammatical errors. Yes check.svg Passes Corrected myself
 * B5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. X mark.svg Fails There's none - a picture of the gun (and possibly it's ammunition) would be a useful first step