Talk:Canonical's contributor agreement

Open Core
It seems this sort of legal arrangement (open source + copyright assignment with rights to use proprietary licenses) is called "open core", which might warrant another article. Some links:
 * http://blogs.computerworlduk.com/simon-says/2010/06/open-core-is-bad-for-you/index.htm
 * http://ebb.org/bkuhn/blog/2010/10/17/shuttleworth-admits-it.html
 * http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2010/07/20/why_nasa_is_dropping_eucalyptus_from_its_nebula_cloud/
 * http://www.ostatic.org/blog/open-core-or-open-snore
 * —Darxus (talk) 23:25, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I think vendor lock-in is relevant. —Darxus (talk) 01:06, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Notability
This article was flagged as being of questionable notability. Perhaps it should be merged into the general Contributor License Agreement and Project_Harmony_(FOSS_group). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Subsolar (talk • contribs) 01:23, 16 August 2011 (UTC)