Talk:Canterbury University Tramping Club

Untitled
Places that mention the CUTC for references:
 * 1) SportsHub.com
 * 2) rogaining.com
 * 3) Federated Mountain Clubs of New Zealand
 * 4) Christchurch City Council
 * 5) Canterbury Mountaineering Club
 * 6) NZ Hotpools
 * 7) University of Canterbury Students Asso
 * 8) nzorienteering.com
 * 9) Softrock
 * 10) alpineclub.org.nz
 * 11) www.sportsbuddy.co.nz
 * 12) avontrampingclub

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Canterbury University Tramping Club. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090805021435/http://www.ucsa.org.nz:80/category/clubs/sport/ to http://www.ucsa.org.nz/category/clubs/sport/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 10:19, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Book?
Ping User:Schwede66 re:. What book? Can you provide quotations, or pageview links, or otherwise tell us why you think this book contains significant content about this club? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 05:49, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi there, Piotrus. This one: Q98995444. My memory didn't serve me right, though, and the University Tramping Club gets a brief mention only on page 287. There are interesting looking sources in the bibliography, though. For example, both The Press and the Lyttelton Times had special supplements on 12 May 1923 for the 50th anniversary. That should be online at Papers Past.  Schwede 66  07:27, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Do let me know if you find anything, for now I have finished my AfD draft which I'll archive here for now, pending looking for more sources: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (organizations) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. Claim of "one of the lagest" failed (cited ref is just a regular listing on the uni's page), also not even mentioned at University_of_Canterbury, where it could redirect if anyone finds a single reliable source that would warrant merging something there. There are a few passing mentions, but nothing in the article seems salvageable as the refs are either PRIMARY, likely unreliable, in passing or fail verification. ". --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 07:40, 9 September 2020 (UTC)