Talk:Capcom Five/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Grapple X (talk • contribs • count ) 02:24, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * I've made virtually all of the changes you suggested. A few points though:
 * "I'd also consider breaking up the "Release and reception" section with subheadings for each title. It would aid navigation, and having the titles appear in the TOC would also give an instant visual list of the "Five" to a reader, which wouldn't hurt."
 * It feels a bit weird to me to have sections consisting of only one paragraph. Maybe it's just me. Perhaps I could use section or anchor to create anchors to those paragraphs and then make a custom TOC to display those links? I can show you what I mean if you like, since it's a bit complicated...
 * ""Killer7 ultimately debuted on multiple consoles" -> You only get one début, so perhaps "ultimately appeared on multiple consoles"?"
 * The sentiment I was trying to convey here is that while Viewtiful Joe was released first on GCN and then PS2 a year later, Killer7 had a multi-platform release from the start. I tried to make that more clear. Dunno if it worked.
 * "" under- or overstocking inventory" -> this looks awkward since properly, under-stocking is hyphenated but overstocking isn't. Perhaps spell them both out fully as "under-stocking or overstocking"?"
 * I just used "over-stocking" to preserve the parallelism. I'm assuming it's an accepted alternate spelling. Is that legit?
 * "All grand except for ref 54, which is just a bare url."
 * So Reflinks says that website is blacklisted so I'm unsure of its reliability. It's in Japanese so I don't know. I just commented it out until I find some more detailed sales info.
 * Re:Images
 * This shouldn't affect anything at all, but just in case you were curious, I found a GREAT pic on Flickr of Shinji Mikami and Suda51 (http://www.flickr.com/photos/atomixakira/5630742806/) which would be perfect for this article. I emailed the photographer about changing the licensing and I'm awaiting a response.
 * Thanks for the review. I've been staring at this prose for over a week so I'm clearly incapable of finding further faults, so thanks for the extra set of eyes. Axem Titanium (talk) 05:55, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I've made virtually all of the changes you suggested. A few points though:
 * "I'd also consider breaking up the "Release and reception" section with subheadings for each title. It would aid navigation, and having the titles appear in the TOC would also give an instant visual list of the "Five" to a reader, which wouldn't hurt."
 * It feels a bit weird to me to have sections consisting of only one paragraph. Maybe it's just me. Perhaps I could use section or anchor to create anchors to those paragraphs and then make a custom TOC to display those links? I can show you what I mean if you like, since it's a bit complicated...
 * ""Killer7 ultimately debuted on multiple consoles" -> You only get one début, so perhaps "ultimately appeared on multiple consoles"?"
 * The sentiment I was trying to convey here is that while Viewtiful Joe was released first on GCN and then PS2 a year later, Killer7 had a multi-platform release from the start. I tried to make that more clear. Dunno if it worked.
 * "" under- or overstocking inventory" -> this looks awkward since properly, under-stocking is hyphenated but overstocking isn't. Perhaps spell them both out fully as "under-stocking or overstocking"?"
 * I just used "over-stocking" to preserve the parallelism. I'm assuming it's an accepted alternate spelling. Is that legit?
 * "All grand except for ref 54, which is just a bare url."
 * So Reflinks says that website is blacklisted so I'm unsure of its reliability. It's in Japanese so I don't know. I just commented it out until I find some more detailed sales info.
 * Re:Images
 * This shouldn't affect anything at all, but just in case you were curious, I found a GREAT pic on Flickr of Shinji Mikami and Suda51 (http://www.flickr.com/photos/atomixakira/5630742806/) which would be perfect for this article. I emailed the photographer about changing the licensing and I'm awaiting a response.
 * Thanks for the review. I've been staring at this prose for over a week so I'm clearly incapable of finding further faults, so thanks for the extra set of eyes. Axem Titanium (talk) 05:55, 11 September 2011 (UTC)


 * I would avoid using an artificial TOC, it's something that would have to be manually tracked if the article's headings change at all. That image looks great, so if you can get using it that would be brilliant. I think we're good to go here, so I'm going to pass this one. Well done! GRAPPLE   X  11:30, 11 September 2011 (UTC)