Talk:Cape Verde/Archive 3

Tech Park Cabo Verde
I think the TechPark referenced in the Science and technology section has potential to be its own article, if anyone is interested in creating it. I created a red link for now, but if anyone feels it's not notable enough, feel free to revert. The government's website for the initiative has not been updated in about two years now - not sure if the project has stalled. https://www.techpark.cv/techpark-overview/ Sushi725 (talk) 17:49, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Requested move 26 March 2022

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: Not moved. Closed earlier because "there's a snowball's chance in hell of being accepted" at this point. If this page needs to be moved, there should be a strong rationale that supports it considering its history at RM. (non-admin closure) (CC)  Tb hotch ™ 17:39, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Cape Verde → Cabo Verde – I don't know why I am submitting this but I just noticed a lot of books and sources call it Cabo Verde, I'm sorry for my mistakes Jishiboka1 (talk) 14:41, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Did you look at the previous RMs for this page before opening this? CMD (talk) 14:51, 26 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Oppose per WP:USEENGLISH and WP:COMMONNAME. Based on the Google Ngrams, the most common name for this subject in English is the current title. Rreagan007 (talk) 02:30, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Oppose per Rreagan007. Ale3353 (talk) 08:58, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
 * If you don't know why are you submitting this, don't submit it. Super   Ψ   Dro  09:16, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Oppose for same reasons as above Sushi725 (talk) 16:03, 29 March 2022 (UTC)


 * OpposeThis request seems quite silly - Cape Verde has always been the proper name Twa0726 (talk) 06:19, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Oppose per WP:COMMONNAME. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:44, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Oppose per WP:COMMONNAME. -Roxy the grumpy dog . wooF 15:43, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Oppose. As one who has supported the successful proposal of Kiev → Kyiv and the as-yet-unsuccessful proposal of Odessa → Odesa, I am sympathetic to local requests for geographic name changes. However, each case must be considered on its own merits and, while the above-mentioned cases represent a change to native transliteration, rather than a name change, requests for English exonym changes such as Cape Verde → Cabo Verde, East Timor → Timor Leste or Ivory Coast → Côte d'Ivoire represent a change from the country's English-language exonym to the country's name in the former European colonial country's language, not the country's native language. The successful move of Swaziland → Eswatini proves the point that a move from the former colonial name to the name in the local language (Rhodesia → Zimbabwe or South West Africa → Namibia) is very likely to achieve success. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 17:06, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Apology
I apologize, I thought that RMs were a way to discuss move requests. From now on I will be more careful and read many sources before requesting a move. Jishiboka1 (talk) 00:24, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
 * RMs are the proper way to discuss a move, there was nothing wrong with that! But it's a good idea, before proposing anything, to be familiar with the applicable guidelines, the criteria that will be considered in deciding on an outcome, and to present a justification that take those into consideration. Largoplazo (talk) 02:20, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

Switch to preferred name: Cabo Verde
If they want to be called Cabo Verde, we should call them Cabo Verde. This seems like a reasonable change. 75.164.37.9 (talk) 05:28, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
 * The guideline applicable to country names is WP:COMMONNAME. We don't go by preference, we go by the name found to be the most commonly used in reliable sources in English. See the list of previous discussions on this subject at the top of this page. Usage may have changed in the 10 months since the last discussion, but anyone formally proposing a name change (see WP:Requested moves) ought to have done some research to make a case that the criteria for changing the name have been met. Largoplazo (talk) 11:25, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

San Luzia reference in Administrative divisions
This article (but not the linked Administrative divisions of Cape Verde article) suggests that the municipality of São Vicente, Cape Verde comprises the islands of São Vicente and Santa Luzia, Cape Verde. The Administrative divisions of Cape Verde (see below the municipalities table) and Santa Luzia, Cape Verde articles suggest that Santa Luzia is a) uninhabited (which does not preclude belonging to São Vicente, Cape Verde) and b) not part of any municipality, but in the public domain of the state of Cape Verde (which does).

Therefore I suggest that the indication that the the municipality of São Vicente, Cape Verde includes Santa Luzia, Cape Verde be removed. Hayttom (talk) 20:41, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Someone has made two BIG mistakes:
 * First, it was merging the municipalities with islands (or municipalities with cities) just because there are some coincidental names. This is not how the things work here in Cabo Verde. Islands and municipalites are considered different things. An island is a geographical feature, a piece of land. A municipality is an administrative division (even if it has the same name as an island), it means that it is the piece of the territory which is “bossed” by so and so. Also, the municipalites must not be merged with cites. All the municipalites in Cabo Verde are way bigger than the cities they include.
 * Second, someone has changed the municipalites table. Living here in Cabo Verde, I know for sure that the Santa Luzia was not detached from the Municipality of São Vicente. The source referred there talks about a proposal, nothing else.
 * Could someone correct all of this, please?
 * 165.90.125.243 (talk) 13:28, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Island and municipalities are different everywhere. They are covered together due to the extensive overlap in their topic. CMD (talk) 13:49, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Sorry, you are mistaken. There is no “extensive” overlap, the overlap (I repeat, only in some cases) is mostly in area. 165.90.125.243 (talk) 15:25, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:47, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Cape Verde Product Exports (2019).svg