Talk:Cara Cunningham/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: (CK)Lakeshade -  (CK)Lakeshade  -  talk2me  - 23:59, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Im sorry but i will be failing this article:
 * Trivial section is WP:OR and not allowed anyways.
 * Selected videography is trivial and fails WP:GAC 3b.
 * Entire article contains WP:OR and references that fail WP:RS such as: Myspace and Youtube, which the majority of the article uses. Articles must contain 3rd party reliable coverage.
 * We have WP:NOTABILITY and WP:UNDUE issues in abundance in this article.
 * WP:MOS violations such unformatted references.


 * Stage by stage:
 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: