Talk:Carbide.c++

I don't understand the presence of a dead Link by the end. Please provide a actual link to the contents!

In response to the advertisement tags, I have made this a bit more apparently neutral.

Some of the stuff I've said is not verifiable, in that it refers to the reaction in various Symbian OS development companies I've worked at, and also on the now-closed beta discussion group [here].

I suspect that might be objected to, ironically either by the Wikipedians who favour strict verifiability, or by Nokia who probably didn't want to swap an "advert" tag for some mild criticism ;-) In which case remove it. I expect the article will evolve to be a bit more neutral but with verifiable statements.

As for the tag about whether the article is about something too obscure, I disagree. I don't work for Nokia, but I am involved in Symbian OS development, and Carbide is one of the most important things related to Symbian OS development - it should definitely be included within Wikipedia. Adetaylor 08:04, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Critism of Carbide
I think the critism of Carbide is wrong. Carbide is not slow compaired to other IDE's (for instance Visual Studio) - in fact I would say it's faster in many areas. Sure, it uses more memory (about 150MB, or so), but that's quite acceptable on a modern PC. If you want to throw critism at Carbide you should pick on the debugger. Carbide cannot display character arrays, nor strings properly in the variable view window when debugging - really a quite shocking omision. Not really Nokia's fault though, rather it's the CDT project and the Eclipse debugger which is quite inflexible. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Samarai blogger (talk • contribs) 19:12, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:CarbideDevToolsLogo.gif
Image:CarbideDevToolsLogo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:02, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 one external links on Carbide.c++. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110225122608/http://www.forum.nokia.com/info/sw.nokia.com/id/dbb8841d-832c-43a6-be13-f78119a2b4cb.html to http://www.forum.nokia.com/info/sw.nokia.com/id/dbb8841d-832c-43a6-be13-f78119a2b4cb.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090810003411/http://www.forum.nokia.com:80/Tools_Docs_and_Code/Tools/Platforms/S60_Platform_SDKs/ to http://www.forum.nokia.com/Tools_Docs_and_Code/Tools/Platforms/S60_Platform_SDKs/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140419122419/http://developer.nokia.com/community/wiki/Symbian_C%2B%2B to http://developer.nokia.com/community/wiki/Symbian_C%2B%2B

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 23:55, 14 November 2016 (UTC)