Talk:Carbonaceous sulfur hydride

Did you know
Hi all, great job making this page so fast. We only have seven days to nominate the article for WP:Did you know and I very much believe that should be done. We need to double the size of the article first, to at least 1500 characters of prose. This would be great for Did you know, just "Did you know, Carbonaceous sulfur hydride is the first ever room temperature superconductor?" or something like that. Any thoughts? I will help out with the article where I can. Thanks again! Footlessmouse (talk) 23:08, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

My proposal for Did you know. Please let me know what you think as the deadline to submit is in just a few days. Thanks! Footlessmouse (talk) 00:50, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
 * ... that synthesized carbonaceous sulfur hydride is the world's first room-temperature superconductor?

I have went ahead and submitted the hook for did you know. If anyone has suggestions, please let me know. Footlessmouse (talk) 04:52, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

trihydrogen sulfide

 * In 2020 carbonaceous sulfur hydride beat the record set by lanthanum decahydride of about −20°C, and was inspired by trihydrogen sulfide, the previous record holder.

One of the DYK people rejected this statement. I have removed from the article so we can find citation for it before adding back, so as to avoid a citation needed template. Footlessmouse (talk) 06:48, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
 * That was in the original Nature publication. Just about everything is referencable to that paper. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:32, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

CH8S or CHS8
Hi. The infobox says the chemical formula is CH8S, while the body says it's CHS8. I am not subscribed to Nature, and thus I can't verify any of them; can anyone correct the incorrect one?  —Biscuit-in-Chief :-)  (/tɔːk/ – /ˈkɒntɹɪbs/) 16:02, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
 * CH8S and CSH8 are equivalent. The chembox uses Hill notation. I put C and S first as the heavy elements in the body. I cannot see a CHS8, that would not be a hydrogen rich substance, and almost certainly wrong. Since little is published on the structure, I could not put in a more structural denotation, eg CH4•SH2•H2, or CH3SH5. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:14, 28 December 2020 (UTC)