Talk:Cardiotocography

Additions/new article
I could not find any article regarding STAN on wikipedia. STAN is an acronym for ST-analysis and is the addition of ST-segment analysis to the standard CTG recording. This has shown to be a better and more precise method than CTG alone, and is now in widespread use. Could someone write an article on this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.165.75.134 (talk) 15:07, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Merge
This article should be merged with Cardiotocograph and possibly also with Nonstress test. --Una Smith (talk) 04:04, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The article has since been merged with nonstress test, but the merger between Cardiotocograph and Cardiotocography still needs to be done. Are there any preferences for the title of the merged article?  Looking at analogous medical articles (mostly in Category:Medical imaging), articles seem to favor using -graphy over -graph or -gram (though an exception is electrocardiogram - which should probably be moved to electrocardiography).  --Scott Alter 02:35, 11 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Nonstress test is still posted as a separate article. Maybe a redirect is needed? Biolprof (talk) 15:48, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Cardiotocograph is now redirected to this article.  Nonstress test does not need to be merged or redirected as it is distinct diagnostic test.  jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 03:07, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Refs
This article currently has no refs. One good ref is re cardiotocography vs Doppler auscultation. --Una Smith (talk) 04:04, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

copyvio
The tone is wrong and some seems to be from. 87.83.31.234 (talk) 07:39, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Reassuring and non-reassuring
You say: proposed terminology of a three-tiered system to replace the older undefined terms "reassuring" and "nonreassuring" Sure.. but you should mention what reassuring and nonreassuring is Remember this is just a PROPOSAL 182.255.99.214 (talk) 09:51, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Cardiotocography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110727153519/http://www.rcog.org.uk/womens-health/clinical-guidance/use-electronic-fetal-monitoring to http://www.rcog.org.uk/womens-health/clinical-guidance/use-electronic-fetal-monitoring
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101129220647/http://sogc.org/guidelines/documents/gui197CPG0709r.pdf to http://www.sogc.org/guidelines/documents/gui197CPG0709r.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 11:59, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

AI methods?
has added (and then re-added after reversion) a section about an innovative AI method for cardiotocography interpretation. I argue that this section, being based on a method proposed by a single author in a text book chapter, with no evidence that the method has been implemented and proven in practice, is speculative at best and does not yet merit inclusion in this article. See WP:MEDRS for a discussion of reliable sources on medical information. I invite IntelligentAgent300 to discuss this matter. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:20, 30 April 2021 (UTC)