Talk:Carina Axelsson

Sourcing
I don't think the blog sources qualify as reliable sources for WP:RS. I'd like the editor who added them to explain his reasoning. But there are a lot of such sources out there, and the material shouldn't be deleted from the article without tagging, which I'll do if there's isn't an explanation in a reasonable time, and an opportunity for improvement. Material bearing on notability should be erased while an AFD is going on, but the sourcing should be clarified. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 20:40, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

AFD result odd
How on earth is four votes to keep and three votes to delete a consensus for "Keep"? Hell, two of the four "Keep" votes come from editors who vote keep on virtually every single AFD they participate in, no matter how obviously they fail Wikipedia criteria... they might as well be bots. It either should have been relisted to get more input or closed as "no consensus". DreamGuy (talk) 22:04, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Can't believe this is still here
I really can't believe this is still here - with the exception of the New York Times article, they are ALL blogs and fan sites! But one particular fan just keeps this one rocking. I edited to include some cautions about the sources. And why her fan (or maybe she's doing it herself) keeps insisting that she was born in Sweden is beyond me. California Public Records clearly show otherwise, and it's yet another example of the kind of pink press that this girl and her boyfriend like to promote about her. I'm specifically not linking the CPR to Wiki because I think privacy is important to anyone; if someone is stalker-y enough to research the records themselves, power to them.

I can do the "citation" needed thing if someone will post the code here. PR (talk) 20:58, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

3O
royalandco.wordpress.com is not a reliable source, as it's just a personal blog, and thus fails WP:RS quite dramatically. DreamGuy (talk) 14:55, 22 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Other 3O: Agreed. Blogs are not acceptable as WP:RS; see WP:SPS for more. &mdash;  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 18:00, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Where's the dispute?
A third opinion is called for when two editors dispute something. There seem to be several editors here who all agree that blogs are not WP:RS (I concur about that particular blog). Where's the dispute? --RegentsPark (My narrowboat) 18:17, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, there were only two editors recently active when I posted the 3O. People had in the past been clear, but an edit was still ignoring it. The person who put those WP:RS-violating content there has been edit warring over it recently, despite knowing during the AFD and since that the sources are not considered reliable. I was hoping we'd force the editor to give up his edit warring and bow to consensus. DreamGuy (talk) 19:22, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
 * It seems clear that there is consensus. If the editor persists in edit warring, you can warn him/her that he/she could be blocked and, if edit warring continues, report the editor to the editwarring notice board (or bring the matter to the attention of an uninvolved admin).--RegentsPark (My narrowboat) 20:22, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Wish I'd have known it was up for deletion again
Because it really should be. Sleeping with a very minor prince is absurdly non-notable. Heck, I've done it myself. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ProperlyRaised (talk • contribs) 17:17, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Carina Axelsson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141030025635/http://www.carinaaxelsson.com:80/about-carina to http://www.carinaaxelsson.com/about-carina

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 05:51, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Requested move 26 July 2023

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Consensus is that this isnt the common name. (non-admin closure) - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 00:27, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

Carina Axelsson → Carina, Princess of Sayn-Wittgenstein-Berleburg – Since June 3, 2022 (civilly) and June 4, 2022 (religiously), Carina officially married Gustav after 19 years of being together. I feel that its fair to have her page reflect that. The Danish Royal Family lists Carina as Her Highness Princess Carina on Princess Benedikte's page on their site. They also made an announcement when their son was born reflecting that status as well. Mirrorthesoul (talk) 22:50, 26 July 2023 (UTC)