Talk:Carl's Afternoon in the Park

Untitled
This reads like a book review, which is nice, but it doesn't express a neutral point of view. Some countervailing opinions would seem appropriate. --Kelly Martin 02:32, Jan 18, 2005 (UTC)

A very fair point. I'm tempted to read this book if only to overhaul the entry. Perhaps someone familiar with the work could come in instead? I feel that this (depending on the traffic it receives) is more a case for deletion until someone can come along and pen something truly worthwhile. -- Steve McFarland 02:02, March 26, 2005 (PST)
 * I tried rewriting it, as a result I think it's more NPOV but less well written. --CVaneg 07:04, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)


 * I don't think we should get too extreme about NPOV... wiki consensus seems to be that any commercially published book is notable and deserving of an entry, but do we really need a full literary analysis and critique? I'll pull the NPOV flag, since there's nothing along the lines of "this is the best book ever" in the article right now. Feco 05:27, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 13:32, 9 November 2007 (UTC)