Talk:Carl Laemmle

Assessment comment
Substituted at 10:54, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 one external links on Carl Laemmle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071112071533/http://www.j-zeit.de/archiv/artikel.465.html to http://www.j-zeit.de/archiv/artikel.465.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150519010823/http://www.laemmle.us:80/the-new-generation/ to http://www.laemmle.us/the-new-generation/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130412153031/http://www.laemmle.us to http://www.laemmle.us
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040124103424/http://archives.studio.universalstudios.com:80/ to http://archives.studio.universalstudios.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 08:51, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Commercially unsuccessful?
Dracula (1931) is described here as 'commercially unsuccessful'. On the film's own wiki page, it says: ''...Dracula proved to be a huge box office sensation. Within 48 hours of its opening at New York's Roxy Theatre, it had sold 50,000 tickets, building a momentum that culminated in a $700,000 profit, the largest of Universal's 1931 releases.'' Valetude (talk) 16:28, 4 August 2017 (UTC)