Talk:Carlos Diegues

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Collegekid2020. Peer reviewers: Dgenners, Mariaa45.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 16:49, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Carlos Diegues. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070210002933/http://www.carlosdiegues.com.br:80/ to http://www.carlosdiegues.com.br/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 14:49, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Maria’s peer review
There is a huge content gap in this article. More biographical information can be provided on the like of Carlos Diegues. In addition to more information about his life, you can see if he did something else other than being a film director, such as being a prominent social figure in Brazilian society. You can also include more details on what genre of movies he made. Going off the movie idea, talking about his most popular movie and how it impacted or represented Brazilian society would also be informative.

When adding all this information, proper structure should follow meaning that appropriate headings should be given. All the links worked on the current page and seemed neutral, but there are only three sources present. More primary sources are definitely needed and scholarly sources are also needed. Since no comments are currently present on the talk page, hopefully this helps! Mariaa45 (talk) 19:06, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Peer Review
I would agree with the importance of all of the proposed additions to this article that are mentioned above. I believe that the most pressing is expanding on the information with reliable sources. Also, reformatting to add more subsections within the article will make information more easily followed by the reader. Dgenners (talk) 00:53, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Maria’s Second Peer Review
No edits have been made to this page since my initial peer review, so my advice from there still stands! I look forward to reading it once you have updated it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mariaa45 (talk • contribs) 14:50, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Danica's Second Peer Review
I second the above point and am excited to read the article once it has been changed. Dgenners (talk) 17:08, 1 April 2018 (UTC)