Talk:Carlos Landín Martínez/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Willbb234 (talk · contribs) 05:46, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Comment: I have already read and copyedited this article. Willbb234Talk (please &#123;&#123;ping&#125;&#125; me in replies) 05:46, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Copyedited roughly ten days ago. All good.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * Plenty of WP:RS to back up information.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Covers the topic well and explains the key areas in detail
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Written neutrally
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * Stable
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * A single, non-free image but with fair use rationales. Used appropriately
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Very well written article. More images would have been good, but due to the subject of the article, good images are hard to come by.