Talk:Carly Chaikin

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Carly Chaikin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141006175510/http://abc.go.com/shows/suburgatory/cast/dalia-royce to http://abc.go.com/shows/suburgatory/cast/dalia-royce

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 19:11, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Mother's profession
The author misread the mother's profession from the two cited sources. They say she is a psychotherapist, not a physiotherapist. Dkelber (talk) 02:31, 23 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Changed to psychotherapist as suggested. (If by some chance the sources are wrong ... and that has happened many times before ... then editors would have long since replied to the above comment and provided better sources, so I think I should be safe to go with what the sources actually say.) -- 109.77.208.104 (talk) 01:46, 11 November 2019 (UTC)


 * While I hope The Hollywood Reporter has fact checkers and did not copy the incorrect information from here when they said her mother was a pysiotherapist, but we can only guess, because wrong information goes out from Wikipedia and circles right back. -- 109.77.208.104 (talk) 02:26, 11 November 2019 (UTC)


 * I traced the change back to an unexplained edit, that changed psychotherapist to physiotherapist without giving any reason for the change or explaining why either of the two sources might be wrong.
 * I was going to ask User talk:BrillLyle to maybe explain the edit but if you try and leave a talk page comment you get a warning saying User:BrillLyle has been permanently blocked. -- 109.77.208.104 (talk) 02:33, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Photo
Is that the best photo available for the article? It seems uncharacteristic of how she looks in most photos, and slightly... well, scary, with that lighting.219.88.68.195 (talk) 23:22, 13 March 2022 (UTC)