Talk:Carmen Kass

Untitled
Apparently, the rationale is missing in here... -Mardus 10:50, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

Copy-paste from http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/carmen+kass ---lulu- 11:44, 4 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Actually, that is a mirror site which displays Wikipedia articles, as the smalltext at the bottom of the page says ("This article is copied from an article on Wikipedia.org"). The GFDL license allows this. See Mirrors and forks. PeepP 12:48, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

modelsobserver.com links
This and other Wikipedias in other languages have been relentlessly spammed by anonymous IPs based in Israel (where the domain is registered) for many months. It's gotten sufficiently bad as to warrant addition to the spam blacklist and I have removed a number of these links in anticipation of blacklisting: Most, but not all, had been added by the site-owner.
 * Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam (permanent link)
 * meta:Talk:Spam blacklist (permanent link)

If an established, high-volume editor sees value to the specific link I deleted from this article, please let me know and it can be evaluated for addition to the spam "whitelist" -- A. B. (talk • contribs) 03:26, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

model vs. supermodel
quoted "supermodel Carmen Kass" has about 2,110 returns in google and 8 in google books. In case it might be a problem that some models happen to be supermodels, it should be taken to relevant article. As long as Carmen Kass is listed as a supermodel and that includes published books, there is no reason to manipulate this fact according to personal opinions by removing the sources like the edit by User:Catgut. Unless of course we should establish the notability of this model by quoting the WP supermodel article an say that Carmen Kass is a highly-paid élite fashion model who has worldwide reputation. Also, User:Catgut please read WP:NPOV since removing facts and sources can't be justified with this policy. WP:NPOV doesn't mean No Point of View but ..in case you can come up with sources that say Carmen Kass is notable because this and that, not because she is considered to be a supermodel, you should add the facts and the sources to the article instead of removing already established facts and sources. Thanks! --Termer (talk) 00:58, 18 October 2008 (UTC)