Talk:Carmen Robertson

Contested deletion
This page is not unambiguously promotional, because this article has been edited. It talks about the artist and the work she has done in her career. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Secuur2k (talk • contribs) 22:44, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because there has been many edits done to this page please revise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Secuur2k (talk • contribs) 22:46, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (The article was revised and edited as well as referencing has been added) --Mlscawsand (talk) 00:21, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
 * includes lots of citations. Seems like the deletion is unwarranted. --Chittah (talk) 04:12, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

the article was created at an editathon at the unversity of regina, where carmen robertson herself was there. a new book written by her coming out soon which needs promotion. this stinks. it is not important if it legally is a conflict of interest. carmen robertson could have said "please do not put my name on a list on the university i work for, in a room where i am, with people i know very well". it shades too much bad taste on the whole story, and with it damages other similar style events. to let this happen i consider bad behavior or bad character, from the organizers, from persons there, and carmen robertson. carmen robertson might be one of the nicest and competent persons on this planet - but damaging her reputation with an unnecessary story like this is not worth it, imo. --ThurnerRupert (talk) 16:27, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I think this another datum in the wall of evidence indicating the gradual slide of WP toward a directory. This person is not notable by our conventional standards (holdings, cites, sources) and is yet another example of the boosterism that will eventually ruin WP as an encyclopedic resource. Agricola44 (talk) 15:47, 24 March 2016 (UTC).