Talk:Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education

Update
I added the "update" notification as this article is now out of date. I'm sorry that I don't have time at the moment to make the changes but:


 * The new classification schemes need to be added and explained.
 * The basic classificiation scheme needs to be updated. This is the scheme currently listed in the article but is being revised and updated.  As of this moment, Carnegie hasn't released the final version of the basic classification scheme.

It would also be nice to summarize the classifications' history, the reasons why the classification was updated and changed, and how/why people use (and misuse) these classifications.

--ElKevbo 20:17, 15 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Page has been updated with 2005 classifications. More history and context would be nice. --ElKevbo 16:12, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Carnegie Classification Web site <- this link on page appears to be broken. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.190.191.84 (talk) 18:18, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Looks like they just redesigned their website.  I fixed this link but I wonder how many other broken links we have throughout Wikipedia now... :(  --ElKevbo (talk) 18:36, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

The 2018 classification are found at; http://carnegieclassifications.iu.edu/   — Preceding unsigned comment added by Reerickson (talk • contribs) 19:14, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Master’s Colleges and Universities - doesn't make sense
At the beginning of the section, it says that to be in the section an institution must "awarded at least 50 master’s degrees in 2003–04, but fewer than 20 doctorates." Then it goes on to subdivide the main section into three groups. 1: More than 200. 2: 50-150. 3: less than 50.

If they award less than 50, they shouldn't be in the category. What about colleges that award between 150 and 200?! in which category do they fall? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.87.254.215 (talk) 05:29, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Good catch! I fixed it. ElKevbo (talk) 05:59, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070929061656/http://www.carnegieclassification-preview.org/pdf/cc2005.pdf to http://www.carnegieclassification-preview.org/pdf/cc2005.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 23:05, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
-- footnote #6 sent me to a malware page. the proper urls should be from; http://carnegieclassifications.iu.edu/

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080822012422/http://www.carnegiefoundation.org/classifications/ to http://www.carnegiefoundation.org/classifications/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080822012422/http://www.carnegiefoundation.org/classifications/ to http://www.carnegiefoundation.org/classifications/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 22:10, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Typographical Error Identified
“using to the same criteria” under the ninth revision. Can this be updated to exclude the extra “to”? Kuggerands (talk) 21:58, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Got it. Thanks! ElKevbo (talk) 14:40, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Hello,
 * You removed “the” instead of “to”, therefore, the sentence still contains a typographical error in my opinion.
 * Please advise. Kuggerands (talk) 15:57, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks. ElKevbo (talk) 16:06, 18 June 2023 (UTC)