Talk:Carnival Elation

Merger

 * The following discussion is closed. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

why merge it? it's fine Jerrycobra 04:35, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * no it's not, it doesn't merit an article of itself. non-notable and looks like an advertisement. nothing encyclopedic about it. Berserkerz Crit 12:29, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

For what it is worth, I think it should stay. Sercurity, missing persons and norovirus outbreaks can be documented. rastoddart 6:25, 27 January 2007

MS Elation should have its own article; it makes no sense whatsoever to merge it. Michael Merali 21:31, 13 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The practice on Wikipedia has been to have a separate article for each large passenger vessel. Often pages for ships of the same class come from the same template, but differences in decor, routings, and histories soon differentiate the vessels.  It is true that many articles, when started, have relied too much on copy from cruise websites or the cruise lines themselves, but the standard of edit work is rising.  There are some active contributors to these articles and their efforts should not be stymied by trying to shoehorn all noteworthy facts about several dozen ships into one article about their owner.  Does anyone really want to merge articles on RMS Mauretania (1906), RMS Lusitania, RMS Aquitania, RMS Queen Mary, RMS Queen Elizabeth, RMS Caronia, RMS Queen Elizabeth 2, and RMS Queen Mary 2, and several dozen others, into Cunard Line?  Each vessel is unique and should have a unique article. Kablammo 22:01, 13 February 2007 (UTC)


 * I see no reason to merge it. Every cruise ship has its own article, so theres no need to merge this one with Carnival Cruise Lines Splamo 02:16, 20 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page
Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:


 * http://www.ship-technology.com/projects/elation/
 * Triggered by  on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.— cyberbot II NotifyOnline 13:17, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

✅ This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.— cyberbot II NotifyOnline 20:33, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion: You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:23, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Carnival Celebration in La Coruna.jpg