Talk:Carol Nolan

Suspension
please show what sources state "she was suspended from the party for three months for voting in accordance with her moral conscience and refusing to obey the party leadership's pro-abortion referendum stance"; as opposed to "she was suspended from the party for three months for voting against legislation to allow for a referendum on the repeal of the Eight Amendment to the Constitution, support for which had been adopted at the party's Ard Fheis." Also please note that edit summaries such as "You're a fucking child" are a personal attack that will get you blocked. Bastun Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 20:45, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Telling somebody to "Fuck off" would get you blocked for incivility as well, no?80.111.164.98 (talk) 21:04, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes. It would...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   21:06, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Interesting, that. You taking notes here Bastun?80.111.164.98 (talk) 21:11, 23 March 2018 (UTC)


 * The IP seems to know all the rules... just as if they'd been around for a while now. Pity you don't actually follow them. I see you've not responded at all to the above request for a citation, so I'll be restoring the NPOV version backed by one. Bastun Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 21:49, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Its just common sense really. We are not in a pub, we're on Wikipedia, which has some degree of professionalism. As for the citation request, read the citation.80.111.164.98 (talk) 21:55, 23 March 2018 (UTC)


 * I've read the citation. In fact, I quote it above. The changes I made are fully sourced to it. Your edits aren't. Bastun Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 20:37, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
 * How does the citation contradict anything in my preferred version? I will answer that for ye, it does not.80.111.164.98 (talk) 20:43, 24 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Where do the words "according to her moral conscience" appear in the citation? They do not. As opposed to "she was suspended from the party for three months for voting against legislation to allow for a referendum on the repeal of the Eight Amendment to the Constitution, support for which had been adopted at the party's Ard Fheis", which is present in the article. As you belatedly noticed, btw, I had already taken it Talk... Bastun Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 20:49, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
 * So what? Those sentences are basically the same. Who says it has to be a copy and paste job?80.111.164.98 (talk) 20:51, 24 March 2018 (UTC)


 * The WP community, in the verifiabilty policy. You've toned it down from yesterday's inclusion "pro-abortion SF leadership" but the sentences are still not anywhere near the same. Now revert to what the source says, please. Bastun Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 22:05, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
 * The source says Nolan disagreed with the Shinners policy on abortion, which is exactly what the article says now.80.111.164.98 (talk) 22:09, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

The source makes no mention of "moral conscience" so we'll remove that OR speculation. Bastun Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 11:22, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

Rather than just reverting and accusing me of edit warring, can you point out where "moral conscience" is, in the source? You know we have a no original research policy - I've requested a citation, you've failed to provide it. Bastun Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 12:28, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

Not surprisingly, 80.111.164.98 has been proven to be an evading editor. GoodDay (talk) 13:36, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

While I can understand the frustration regarding the Macronian-Trudeauite cosmopolitan liberalism of Sir Gerrard, 1st Baronet of Ballymurphy and the Belfast Latte Mafia, I think it sufices to say that Nolan has been suspended for her opposition to abortion, rather than mentioning moral conscience (can an organisation of careerists who administer the north of Ireland for the Queen be called moral?). Claíomh Solais (talk) 21:48, 25 March 2018 (UTC)