Talk:Caroline Chikezie

February 2010 edits
Respectfully, I appreciate your comments and your desire to help. However, the rules of Wikipedia are very specific and may seem unusual. Personal knowledge of a subject is not allowed as the sole source of information. This is known as Original Research WP:OR. All information on Wikipedia must be verifiable based on a published or publicly available source, and that source must be cited in any edits made to an article. It does not matter, on Wikipedia, if something is true if it cannot be verified by a citation. Therefore I reverted your edit, not because it isn't true, but because it wasn't cited. You must come up with a citation (a reference to this information in a book or article or public document, even a school yearbook) before the information can be allowed to change standing material. One note, too: there are even more stringent guidelines regarding biographies of living people WP:BLP. As Caroline Chikezie has chosen to state publicly that her birth year is a certain year, WP editors must provide very clear documentation in order to counter what the person herself has publicly stated. Without a citation for such documentation, the general rule is that what the subject of the article says to be true remains in place. Thank you. Monkeyzpop (talk) 15:25, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Following an apparently new editor's little huff about not having to follow Wikipedia guides for WP:OR and WP:VERIFIABILITY, I have allowed his/her changes to stand despite the failure of that editor to provide citation for the changes. This is perhaps contrary to the spirit of the WP:OR and WP:VERIFIABILITY rules, but in the spirit of collegiality, it must be said that the prior information had not been properly cited, either.  I have removed an incorrectly formatted link "citing" the information to the IMDb, which while useful is a deprecated source as far as WP is concerned, as it does not meet the standards for WP citation.  However, any editor who can provide cited information on this subject is invited to do so, as a citation is acceptable on WP, whereas "I went to school with the subject" is not.  I hope the editor(s) who have tangled with me on this will take note that I have left their material in place.  Starting one's edit history, as User:Ticklecreek did, with mean-spirited accusations is a poor way to begin, especially under WP guidelines of presumption of good faith and civility.Monkeyzpop (talk) 16:38, 16 February 2010 (UTC)