Talk:Carrie Brownstein/Archive 1

Biography assessment rating comment
WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive

The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 02:42, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

deer hunter?
Is the section about deer hunting vandalism? It is unsourced, and other contributions from that IP address seem dubious. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.255.34.200 (talk) 21:11, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Surname
Can you please explain why it is insulting to refer to someone only by their surname? This is part of the manual of style on Wikipedia for all BLP articles, so I'm struggling to see why there's a problem with this. Please also remember to assume good faith when interacting with other editors - we're both here to improve Wikipedia, and edit summaries accusing others of vandalism can be considered uncivil. Marianna251TALK 00:00, 28 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Marianna251 it is Anti-Semetic to refer to a Jewish person by their last name, In my Opinion, I'm Italian, and it is the same of people raised Italian culture, Basically a proper Commonly used First or Middle name should proceed a surname, or a Salutation like Mr, Ms, etc,for instance a one name artist like "Cher" or Madonna can be proper;y respectfully be referred to by One Name, in addition if it is customary to be referred to by your middle name, your Wiki page can exclude your first Name like Willard "Mitt" Romney whose web page is called Mitt Romney, not Willard Romney. However outside that type of exception, it is rude, bad Grammar, Anti-Italian etc to label someone by a last name only, particularly when others in the same sentence get Full Names. So your blanket edit was absolutely Vandalism, and your continued belligerence is Bullying, and anti-ethos of what created Wikipedia for lack off a better linguistic explanation. Wikipedia has literally unlimited space and can properly refer to people by their proper names in a respectful manner, for instance several corrections in the edit corrected the grammar to be consistent within the Sentence. Proper use of Last name like a songwriting team or writing team was left unchanged. Your Blanket Vandalism of reverting the whole edit without regard to the total of the edit is a sign of Vandalism, beyond rude and an abuse of your position as a wiki editor. Your continued reversion of the edit is Vandalism. If you have a problem deal with each Sentence edit. Do not Vandalize edits without reviewing the whole edit, which you absolutely did not do based on the timecode of your edit, you had no  time to review the whole edit with an older page, you just bullied another editor and vandalized an edit twice in my opinion..


 * Fair Disclosure My Younger Brother Ben Kovitz was the person who created Wikipedia or the person who solved this issue to make it possible, I am a News Director, Author, Executive Producer, Producer of both Music and Film,  Ex professional Ski Racer etc, with a Legal Pen Name of Willy Bova I have published under for Decades for Privacy. You will not be allowed to Vandalize my edits.


 * You will need to explain why your behavior is not Bullying, and Vandalism by not dealing with proper english use of a Name in a Sentence. You need to defend yourself or revert the edit.


 * Properly identifying Vandalism and disrespect of an editor is an Opinion, I can defend it is not uncivil and is required in this Case. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WillyBova (talk • contribs) 02:08, 28 July 2017 (UTC)


 * I've indented your reply per WP:THREAD so we can keep a clear line of conversation going - hope that's okay. (FYI, please also remember to sign your talk page comments using ~ or by clicking the link at the bottom of the edit box.)
 * I accept that it may be considered insulting to refer only to someone by surname in Italian ... but this is the English Wikipedia. It is not reasonable or logical to insist that one language/culture follow the conventions of a completely different language/culture. I've flicked through a few biographies and academic textbooks that I own, and all of them refer to people by surname (with the exception of the biography of the Romanov family, since referring to all members of the same family by surname would get very confusing very quickly). This is clearly not something considered insulting or inappropriate in modern English mainstream and academic publications, nor is it considered anti-semitic - I own a lot of psychology textbooks and Jewish scholars such as Freud etc. are referred to by surname, the same as everyone else. While I respect your opinion, it seems to be something that only holds true in Italian, and thus is not appropriate for the English Wikipedia.
 * Moving on to the vandalism accusation, please be aware that Wikipedia also has a very clear definition of what is and is not vandalism (see WP:VAND). Edits and content disputes, like this one, are not vandalism. Again, I would like to politely ask you to assume good faith and offer me the same respect I am offering to you.
 * Finally, it does not matter who you are in everyday life - on Wikipedia you're just another editor. Wikipedia operates by consensus, and the current consensus in the manual of style is to use a person's proper name once and thereafter use their surname. Consensus can change, so you are welcome to challenge it (Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biographies is my best guess for the venue), and if your position is accepted by the community then I will change my editing pattern accordingly. At the moment, however, the manual of style is clear about the use of surnames, and that is why I reverted your edit. Marianna251TALK 12:54, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Wills Bova: Reply

Listen Ms. Marianna 251. Vandalism is an undefined Variable, it is a Legal term it is not an absolute, this is the American Version of Wikipedia Subject to American Law, as it is a Work in Progress Your circular Logic is 1984 Doublespeak to reduce language's definition and meaning, You are trying to  defend an Absurd Failure of logic, and the freedom to  allow respect for the English  Language in it's intended and defined form, where word's have multiple meanings and Sentences referring to peoples names have appropriate option's. Please, Give up up the Ghost and undo your edit, or this discussion will go on Forever till the Supreme Court decides the issue as You have Now Slandered Me. In addition You have admitted I was correct, Revert your edit or this process continues until a Court of Law concludes the issue. So you can pontificate on infinitely about Wiki policy, However it is a Work in Progress, not an absolute by definition in the Creation of the "Wiki" in the  Wikipedia model. There are multiple versions of English, Queen's English, Old English, Canadian English, American English, even Australian English, etc, your argument is Circular and belongs in a 1984 Memory Hole job. I will look into the "talk" attribute parameter when I have time. If you want to continue your pedantic, impertinent argument, feel free to dig a deeper hole, and justify a policy of insulting people that is absolute. It is a losing argument as you have already admitted but for the pedantic claim of "English" wikipedia's absolute claim to allow socially unacceptable insulting context. It is an insult in English to use last names online other cultures besides Italian and Jewish cultures that was just the example I used to make my point. It is also bad grammar, to use a Surname to begin a sentence, particularly when other names used in the same sentence are used as full names granted it is a Flaw in the wiki model, the policy your are pontificating, because of the wiki model, and are full page hyperlinks, mostly use full names, so defending bad grammar and insulting absolutes of a Surname policy that clearly has options as I can list hundreds of pages that properly use full names who appropriate, is absurd and circular. Defending an absolute, to defend an infinite by definition language that actual "English" is, appears to any educated writer to be absurd. Are you claiming this is "Wikipedia English"a new language that is separate from "English"? Which I might ad is one of the most difficult to properly learn and speak as to it's Past, Present, and Future, structure and that it is infinite be definition. In addition Wikipedia is a Work in Progress, not a reduction in process of proper writing dynamics concept and interpretation. So creating an absolute about Surname uses violates the founding principal of the Wikipedia purpose and the English languages fundamental structure. You clearly reverted the Edit with out examining it, the Time code shows that. Your reverting to the previous version is abusive by not examining the entire edit, in addition your argument is clearly circular in the defense of your vandalistic reversion, clearly it can also be described as Pedantic Impertinent Bullying, in your argument, in defense of your behavior.

Ms Marianne251, I identified myself as a real person to let you know you were dealing with a real person, not a Wiki Avatar Alias. That has access to Discovery motions, to determine actual identity of a Wiki Avatar, to serve you a summons, if required should this matter not be resolved. It is in no way intended to imply that editor's are not on a level playing field. Your implication that I am not aware of wiki policy is arrogant in intent and argumentative. Your interpitation that the I was doing so for any other purpose, informing you I was not an Avatar, can easily be seen as Slander and Defamation of Character, in an acceptable interpretation of applicable case law.

Good Day

I may edit this later...


 * Based on your continued incivility and the legal threat made above, I have taken this issue to ANI. Marianna251TALK 18:25, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Willybova: Reply: Ms Marrianna251, You need to respond to your actions and justify your blatant Vandalism of my Edit, and Bullying behavior, I welcome any process that resolves your disrespectful arrogance.