Talk:Cartesian circle

Why "non-primary sources needed"?
I'm removing two instances of "non-primary source needed" that appear with direct quotations of Descarte's replies to the the Circle objection. In the primary source, Descartes is explicitly stating that he is responding to the objection. This does not appear to involve any original research and I think it should not require a secondary source.Nomadx (talk) 11:10, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your contribution to this article! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oludara Orederu (talk • contribs) 22:42, 10 March 2020 (UTC)