Talk:Cartesian skyscraper

Highly amusing.
"This article looks like an automatic or simply very translation". Might I suggest that so too does this? And it also purports to be a template, which, from the look of the code, it is not. Is this meant to be a template? Does this template exist? If so does it contain the same (possibly self-referential) amusing grammatical mistake? Jameshfisher 19:57, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Ha-ha. Very clever. But why didn't you fix the article? Shit happens. It was my manual intervention. I didn't find a good template for this kind of amusing texts. `'mikka (t) 22:57, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 05:54, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Reference cleanup
While adding additional references to the article, I noticed that the origianl reference cited is a dead link. Does anyone have updated information, or should we remove the citation?? Tcxspears (talk) 21:23, 5 December 2013 (UTC)