Talk:Cartwheels in a Sari

Neutrality
The article states "Some disciples of Chinmoy organized efforts to discredit Tamm's story" however there is no detail as to their criticisms, only the author's response to them. For the sake of neutrality there should be some mention of the critics' position otherwise the reader is fed only one side of the controversy.

Well - anyone wanting the other side can read the ridiculously non-neutral "Sri Chinmoy" entry, clearly policed by his continuing devotees. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.63.211.221 (talk) 03:03, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Also, there are some un-sourced sentences that need attention to maintain neutrality:
 * "She also says the guru controlled his pupils by pitting them against one another."
 * "He encouraged members to keep tabs on one another and turn in rule-breakers."
 * "The guru disparaged education"

''' Flat Out   let's discuss it   03:48, 15 July 2013 (UTC)


 * "For the sake of neutrality there should be some mention of the critics' position otherwise the reader is fed only one side of the controversy." Not necessarily. The article is about the book, not about a controversy. That said, the article is written in a very juvenile way and tone, and needs to be cleaned up and made encyclopedic and neutral in tone and wording. Softlavender (talk)
 * I agree it doesn't need to be there if the unsourced sentences referring to "disciples discrediting Tamm's story" are deleted. ''' Flat Out   let's discuss it   06:37, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
 * OK, I think I've deleted what you are referring to. OK to remove the POV tag from the top now? Softlavender (talk) 06:47, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes no problem. ''' Flat Out   let's discuss it

This entire article is copied word for word from one reference!
Hi there guys, just noticed that this article is copied word for word - that is 5 out of 6 paragraphs are basically copy and pasted from ref:2 the Forbes 2009 magazine article. I am pretty sure that on Wikipedia you cannot do that? Anyway, obviously this article is problematic in that it has not actually even been written properly in an encyclopedia style.121.90.227.208 (talk) 08:40, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This article is now under the official copyright investigation process. Editors are welcome to help in creating a non-infringing article, but please do not remove the notice currently on the page.  The notice contains instructions on how you can help.   Murph 9000  (talk) 13:34, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

ref name="nydailynews"> In the book Tamm, an English professor at Ocean County College in New Jersey, wrote about her first 25 years growing up in the Queens-based religious group. Tamm characterizes the charismatic leader's group as a cult, and documents Chinmoy's "masterful tactics of manipulation". She left the group in 1995.

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local/queens/2009/04/24/2009-04-24_child_of_chinmoy_ministry_blasts_cult_in_new_book.html http://www.forbes.com/2009/04/14/jayanti-tamm-carwheels-sari-opinions-book-reviews-cults-sri-chinmoy.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 14:12, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Additional book reviews
Below I am posting a couple of additional book reviews. Softlavender (talk) 03:39, 13 August 2018 (UTC)